Trai Floats Consultation Paper on Internet Telephony

At a time whilst calls thru Skype, Viber and Whatsapp are gaining popularity with each passing day, the Indian telecom watchdog on Wednesday issued a session paper on net Telephony looking for stakeholders’ opinions on various matters starting from additional access fee, name termination costs to fine of service parameters.

in the consultation paper, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) requested the stakeholders to provide their feedback by way of July 21 and counter comments by using August 4.

“What ought to be the additional access fee, overall performance financial institution assure and financial bank guarantee for internet service carriers (ISP) if they are also allowed to offer unrestricted internet Telephony?” the session paper asked.

The telecom provider vendors (TSP) have been asking the regulator for a long time to deliver the net Telephony provider companies or the over-the-pinnacle (OTT) players underneath the ambit of the regulation.

The TSPs had been in search of a level gambling area among themselves and OTT apps which trip on their networks. but the OTT players offer less expensive rates as they do now not need to pay any of the regulatory levies.

The session paper requested: “whether accessing the telecom offerings of a TSP with the aid of the subscriber via public net may be construed as extension of constant line or mobile offerings of the TSP?”

There have been two primary classes for voice transmission over net protocol (IP) networks primarily based at the type of IP network used. while voice is transmitted over public internet, it’s far termed as internet Telephony. similarly while voice is transmitted over managed IP networks, it’s miles termed as Voice over IP (VoIP).

internet Telephony can be deemed to be a subset of voice over IP, in the feel that, when voice is carried over a IP network it may be termed as Voice over IP. And if the IP network in this case is the general public internet then it could be called internet telephony.

The paper additionally sought views on name termination costs. “What have to be the termination charge when call is terminating into internet telephony community? What should be the termination price for the calls originated from internet Telephony community and terminated into the cord-line and wireless community?”

“a way to make sure that customers of international net Telephony calls pay applicable international termination fees?”

The paper also protected protection problems. It asked: “Is it viable to offer place information to the police station while the subscriber is making internet telephony name to emergency number? If yes, how? In case it is not possible to offer emergency offerings through internet Telephony, whether informing difficulty of internet Telephony calls earlier to the clients will be sufficient?”